Be Careful Little Fingers What You Type


As a professor, I often try to impart life lessons, as well as subject-specific lessons, to my students. Many times, I think these are the most important parts of my job. It’s not uncommon for me to have a “side bar” conversation that has nothing to do with marketing or management, but that I believe will make my students better employees in their future.

One topic of conversation has been an encouragement to monitor what students write (and let others write and post about them) on social networks. This is usually brought to mind when a student will send me a “friend request” and while I am happily their friend, I am concerned with what they allow to be available to the world regarding who they are. I remind them that potential employers know how to “google” someone too, and that they want to make sure that their personal “brand” online is concurrent with what they hope to project. If they don’t want potential employees to think of themselves as irresponsible partiers, its probably a good idea to remove those pictures that convey this. While it’s commonly accepted that the Internet lowers people’s inhibitions because there is the perception of anonymity, this facade is quickly shattered when people experience the very real damage that can come from a mismanaged online reputation.

Just like its important for my students to be aware of how they projecting themselves on the Internet, I think its critical that Christians do the same. The same perceived, but false, barriers that causes people to post picture of themselves partying online, often prompts Christians to unthinkingly engage in conversations about their Savior. Many times, I have seen a young person post something about their faith, receive a vicious reply back, and they reply with the same type of venom. Now, its true that they don’t deserve the harsh response, but it’s also just as true that they will probably win no one to Christ with words that don’t reflect Him. This isn’t to say that we should compromise the truths that Christ teach, (of course we should not!) but it does mean that when we engage in a discussion about the Ruler of the universe, we should do so in a way that reflects His grace and love, as well as His innate justice and truth.

It’s also important to remember that Christ’s most gentle words were reserved for nonbelievers. Again, not that He watered down His message for them, He was steadfast in His assertion that He was the only Way, Truth and Life (John 14:6) However, His most scathing words were reserved for the religious leaders who professed to portray Him and did anything but (See Matt. 3:7). Contrast the love poured out on the woman at the well (John 4:1-26), with the table-turning in the temple courts (Matt 21:12-17). To those who did not believe, He demonstrated His majesty through His grace. To those who had the truth, and acted with disregard to it, He exhibited His majesty through justice. Both were consistent with Who He is, but the anger was reserved for those who professed to know Him and yet through their actions disparaged His name.

In summary, to take off from the old Sunday School song “Be careful little fingers what you type” because the audience that you need to be concerned about is not a potential employer, but the “Father up above [who] is looking down with love.” It’s important that our responses to nonbelievers are as “shrewed as snakes, but as innocent as doves” (Matthew 10:16) Make sure your words – whether spoken, acted upon, or submitted electronically, reflect Him.

Continue Reading

The Proof is in the Putting

Jesus, Jesus, how I trust Him!
How I’ve proved Him o’er and o’er;
Jesus, Jesus, precious Jesus!
Oh, for grace to trust Him more!

These words, penned by Louisa M.R. Stead in 1882 have been sung in churches for generations. They stand in sharp contrast to the many antagonists who posit that you can’t proof that God exists. The writer states in this hymn that the proof is possible, because His presence has been demonstrated in her life.

I reflected on these words recently, as I pondered when it meant to “prove Him o’er and o’er.” For those who have walked the Christian journey for any length of time, we recognize that as assuredly as there are moments of confident faith, there are instances of questioning despair. A loved one is diagnosed with cancer. A loving marriage is shattered by divorce. A child is the recipient of unspeakable pain. All of these, quite naturally, can cause us to question God; maybe not in the “do You exist?” sense, although that can certainly be the case. However, even in the staunchest Christian when faced with their personal protagonist of pain may wonder that if God has mercy on who He has mercy, and compassion on who He has compassion (see Romans 9:14-16) why does He withhold His power in bringing healing in our particular situation?

That’s when I realized, the proof that the lyricist wrote about wasn’t, I believe, in having a life in which all pain was immediately obliterated, but instead, was in continually putting her faith in Christ. In other words, to change the phrase, the proof wasn’t necessarily what happened in that particular circumstance, in the “pudding” so to speak, but the proof was in the putting…the perpetual commitment to trusting that God was in control, and that in the end His purposes and His plans would stand firm. God’s existence isn’t proven or disproved through His decision not to prevent a particular trial, but as we continually trust Him we see the proof that He is continuously trustworthy. His faithfulness is often clearest seen in our steadfastness to Him.

Now, some may say this is circular logic. “You are creating what you suspect” they may say. However, my challenge is this. Try it. Followers of Christ know that trusting in God often leads you to what you would least expect, so its not like a preexisting determination is making the equation true. However, by putting your trust in Christ, you can see how in your own life, He is proven faithful, time and time again.

Continue Reading