Being Nice

(A friend challenged me to write a blog with no words over two syllables. I believe this accomplishes that).


Every once in a while I’m accused of being too nice. This doesn’t happen often so it’s not something I worry about. Plus, of all the things to be accused of, this is far from the worse. When someone suggests that my niceness may be a bad thing, my most common response is “I’m really not that nice”. People may argue and take offense at my remark, and while I value their feedback, I know myself better than they do, and the truth is, niceness is not something I possess a lot of. I can be nice, but a strain of niceness is not pulsing through my body. It, in other words, does not define me.

I think one of the reasons people argue is that in today’s world, niceness is often valued far above anything else. Calling someone “mean” is a violent insult. To be nice is more highly prized than being right. My mom faces this with her junior high students when they’ve done something they shouldn’t. They’ll say that she’s yelling at them and being mean, when (as those who know my mom can attest) my mom is the type of person who rarely raises her voice. She’s likely talking sternly to them, but she’s not yelling. Her students though are used to being coddled and told their feelings are what matters most. And as I can attest, being on the wrong end of my mother’s justice is not always good for your feelings, but far more often than not, her actions are right.

While this pertains to junior high students it also pertains to the world at large. This week the Pope got into some deep trouble because of some comments he made about Islam. People were upset at his remarks – not always because they thought they were wrong– but because they viewed them as mean. Whether or not what he said was true seemed to get lost in the debate. What mattered was that he had caused offense.

In a similar vein, I was talking with a friend the other day who told me that he wasn’t that nice of a person. This bluntness surprised me and I started to argue. Later, though, I realized that he’s right. He’s not nice – at least not in the “Mary Poppins-spoon-full-of-sugar-there’s always a bright side” type of way – which is how I think most people mean it. But he’s a great guy and I’m pretty sure that if I needed him – he’d be there (he might argue that point after he reads this blog). I’m also pretty sure that he gives his heart one hundred percent to those he loves and that he wants to be the type of man that he’d be proud of. You hang around long enough and he’ll be sure to offend you, but he’s real – and that’s saying something that most “nice” people can’t.

That’s because niceness is so easily faked. Someone does not have to be sincere to be nice; they just have to get along with those around them. Whether or not their beliefs correspond with their actions does not matter. A lot of times it seems that people are nice because they want other people to think they are, not because a deep love for their fellow human being compels them. A precious few choose instead to be real. They give up being nice for the sake of being nice and instead align their action with what is right, trusting that in doing so their actions will show love. It’s a tough road to follow because it means, like the Pope, you may get into some deep trouble. Doing what’s right is not always the quickest way to win friends and there’s a real chance that that people won’t like you. But we aren’t called to be nice or to be liked, we’re called to love. And love compels us to align our actions with what’s good, noble and pure, despite what people may think.

When Christ was on Earth, He caused a lot of offense. His actions, though, were always informed by love. So should ours. After all, love is a much higher aim than niceness – and a greater challenge to achieve.

Continue Reading

Being made complete

One of the great things about kids is that their ruthlessly honest. I had the opportunity to meet some new neighbors and a boy of about six asked me if I lived with my husband. When I explained with him that I did not, he wanted to know why. My explanation that I hadn’t found the right person was insufficient for him and he demanded that I should go out and find one. I am pretty sure his insistence had more to do with his desire to have someone to play basketball with and less to do with a concern for my happiness, but it was a stark reminder of how children as young as six already believe that completeness requires a spouse.


Another discussion, this time with a highschooler, made this assumption even more apparent. She had heard a couple that we both know describe how their life was incomplete until they met their chosen spouse and she couldn’t figure out why I would be encouraging her that she shouldn’t rely on a guy to complete her. After all, she seemed to say, didn’t I just hear someone I admire say that their life and their personhood was incomplete until they met the one they loved? Why shouldn’t I want the same thing?.

I tried to explain to the young girl that achieving completeness can never be ascertained through human relationships. Truly healthy romantic relationships are built when two people who are complete, or who are at least seeking completeness, come together to form a third entity that is greater than the sum of its parts. I fear my philosophical analogy was probably lost on the teenager, but hopefully I clearly articulated that being complete is not something easily arrived at and it is a process that one can not be expected to achieve at 16.


As Christians, we know that there is a far greater force that human relationships that is working for our completeness. We are taught that we are being molded and shaped by the great Artisan into His perfect and complete vessel. I think its easy to view this process as painful, as it often is. After all, does a lump of clay really enjoy being spun around on a potters wheel? Does sheets of metal enjoy the refining process that takes place as the metalworker creates their masterpiece? Of course these inanimate objects do not suffer a response, but as we imagine ourselves in their place, despair seems to come along with refinement. Often this is true in practice as well as theory.

Whats easy to forget while we are in this process is that the lump of clay shaped never leaves the Masters hands. The same hands that allow the laws of physics to do their work and shape the material into the final work of art, are the hands that have everything invested in the final outcome. The Master does not leave another to this toil, nor does He trust that circumstances alone will bring about the desired aim. Instead, the Master supports and guides the clay through the process so that the clay has the best chance of becoming what its intended to be. The Artisan does not merely allow the process to occur, but He is intimately involved in providing the safety and security that allows the clay to emerge stronger and more resilient.


I don’t know if anyone really achieves completeness this side of heaven. After all, who among us would state, I am finished a completed masterpiece ready to be viewed and admired by the world. But even if we must wait for our Heavenly unveiling to view the full splendor of what the Artisans created, at least we can rest knowing that the work is not for us or for anyone else to do. We merely have to trust in the Masters hands.

Continue Reading