Dangerous Christians

We take great strides to prevent danger. We lock our doors, look both ways, and remain aware of our surroundings. Wet think that we will recognize that which threatens our safety and that we can act against it. However, those who make a career out of protection know that it’s the harm that you don’t anticipate that is the most concerning. It’s the threat that you do not see that is often your undoing.

In Christian circles, we too are on the lookout out for that which might do damage to our faith. However, as Jim Elliot reminds us, perhaps it’s the threat that we aren’t even aware of that we need to be most watchful of. As Elliot states:

We are so utterly ordinary, so commonplace, while we profess to know a Power the Twentieth Century does not reckon with. But we are “harmless,” and therefore unharmed. We are spiritual pacifists, non-militants, conscientious objectors in this battle-to-the-death with principalities and powers in high places. Meekness must be had for contact with men, but brass, outspoken boldness is required to take part in the comradeship of the Cross. We are “sideliners”—coaching and criticizing the real wrestlers while content to sit by and leave the enemies of God unchallenged. The world cannot hate us, we are too much like its own. Oh that God would make us dangerous! (qtd. by Elisabeth Elliot in Shadow of the Almighty: The Life and Testimony of Jim Elliot.)

In other words, it’s the temptation to be safe that is often the greatest threat. We want to remain neutral – to not cause offense, while forgetting that our salvation rests on the scandal of grace. The Good News is promised to be “a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles” (1 Corinthians 1:23), yet we try to make our message palatable and end up making it phony. We want to be a part of the crowd, rather than set apart from it.

Yet, this is not what God has called us to. As Elliot rightly reminds us, when we are harmless – when we preach a God that does not call for a radical eradication of our former self in place of a radical commitment to the one true Christ – we are also impotent. We don’t have an impact because we aren’t even participating in the fight.

My dad used to always say that if Satan wasn’t attacking you it meant one of two things. You better “check your six” because he was coming after you, or, he had decided that you weren’t worth the effort. If you weren’t worth the effort, then you weren’t doing much for Christ’s kingdom – which mean you weren’t a very “dangerous” Christian.

As Elliot exclaims “Oh that God would make us dangerous!”

 

Now it’s your turn…How are you “dangerous” for Christ?

Continue Reading

Burn the Nets

We’ve probably all heard the old tale of how monkeys are caught. Some glittering object is put into a trap and the monkey grabs it. The trap is made in such a way that all the monkey has to do is let go of the glittery possession and they can escape, but they don’t. They would rather hold on to the thing that will end up being the impetus for their demise.

I have no idea if this works in actuality. A quick Google search wasn’t definitive. However, the reason it has probably gained such traction is that we all struggle with letting go. We are prone to cling to things – whether it’s an old relationship, a favorite toy, or our high school yearbooks. We hold on to what we have, afraid that what we might get in return won’t be worth it.

Peter seems to have had this problem. He leaves the fishing business in order to follow Jesus (Mt. 4:18-22), but upon Jesus’ crucifixion he goes right back to the boats (Jn. 21:1-3). He had said he left everything to follow Him, but it was in word only. When things got tough he went back to what was known, what was comfortable. He went back to the past, because he was afraid of what the future would hold.

And to me, it seems the problem is that the nets were waiting for his return. He still hung on to his old life, even when he was living in the new. He hadn’t abandoned his old self; he had just set it aside for a bit.

What he needed to do was to burn the nets; to incinerate any trappings of his former life. To trust in the One that he declared  was the Messiah – resting in the assurance that just as he had taken care of Peter’s past, so He would the future.

Looking back, it’s easy for us to see this, because we know the end of the story. We know that Jesus would go to Peter, prepare a meal, and would mend the fences that were broken by Peter’s denial. Much in the same way we know that at the end of our lives everything we’ve let go of won’t compare to the glory that God’s prepared. But Peter didn’t have that perspective. He just knew that he was alone, and that he had abandoned the One who loved him the most. So his shame and confusion prompted him to return.

But he wouldn’t have had that option…if only he had burned the nets.

 

Please share your thoughts…how have you let go of the past in order to prepare for the future God has called you to?

Continue Reading